|
|
Location: Blogs Dan's Blog |
 |
| Posted by: Dan McGrath |
12/1/2008 |
 Minnesota’s legislature reconvenes in January. One of the first problems lawmakers are likely to face is a huge deficit, moving forward into the next budget biennium. The official economic forecast is due to be released on Thursday, but early indications are it will paint a less than rosy picture.
The state government will likely face a deficit of over $4 billion dollars. In 2008, legislators withdrew $500 million from the reserve fund to help close a $1 billion deficit, leaving only $153 million in reserve account. Borrowing covered the rest of the budget gap, but the bonding bill wasn’t limited to covering essentials. Another $500 million was also borrowed for additional capital project expenditures.
Speaker Kelliher has given a preview of her ideas to close the deficit, saying if it’s too large, it’s difficult to do it just by cuts. The unspoken phrase is tax increases.
The economic problems that have, in part, led to the budget shortfall are the same situations that are sensitive to tax hikes. Unemployment has reached 6% in Minnesota, and is likely to rise further in the near future. Corporate profits are declining, incomes aren’t growing, sales are down and investments are failing. Higher taxes can exacerbate all of these economic conditions.
The state’s Constitution requires a balanced budget each biennium. Faced with such a huge deficit, many legislators are likely to turn to tax increases as a way to cover the government’s budget shortfall. Bonding isn’t practical in our current economic situation. Speaker Kelliher continues to talk about additional “investing” in education and state infrastructure improvements, implying yet more proposals for new spending in the face of a whopping $4 billion deficit.
When many families face increased economic hardship, reduced income, investment losses, loss of home equity and cost of living inflation, state government looks likely to attempt increasing the taxpayer’s burden.
In the run-up to this year’s election, Governor Pawlenty, aware of a looming deficit (expected at the time to weigh in at around $2 billion), made several statements about the need for the state to live within its means, which may indicate a willingness to veto the tax increases that are likely to come across his desk in 2009.
Several candidates for the state’s House of Representatives also promised to put spending cuts ahead of tax increases by signing the Live Within Our Means Commitment. This commitment will soon be put to the test and there are many legislators who have not made this commitment to the taxpayer at all. It will be of supreme importance that Minnesota’s lawmakers hear from their constituents on the upcoming budget issues. Minnesota’s economy can’t afford higher taxes right now. It’s time to take a hard look at reversing the trend of bloated government spending.
|
|
| Permalink |
Trackback |
Comments (3)
Add Comment
|
Re: 2010-2011 Budget Deficit Looming |
By Barb on
12/31/2008 |
| Sure brings back the words said not too long ago by the Larry Pogemiller stating "the people believe we (the government) can spend their money better!" Well, excuse me? And who are "the people", and why not take "the people" you speak of, their income. You must know who "the people" are. It definitely isn't ALL OF US so keep our money out of "the people's pockets who think you can spend THEIR money better." TAKE FROM THEM. Your record shows you have NO CLUE ON SPENDING/ BUDGETTING. |
|
|
Re: Huge Budget Deficit Looming |
By herb on
12/17/2008 |
With all the tax cuts and deregulation you'd think our economy would be in trouble.
I sure hope we don't go back to the highly progressive rates of the 40's and 50's when we were building roads,bridges and colleges like there was a real future in investing in MN. |
|
|
Re: Huge Budget Deficit Looming |
By John Brogger on
12/17/2008 |
It is amazing to see how many, who should surely know better, support the tax and tax and tax and tax mentality. They THINK that they can defy history and economics and because they are “so brilliant” they just “know” that they can make it work this time. IF they are so ignorant as to add even more of a burden on the backs of the productive, they will soon discover the depths of their folly. If you think the “great depression” was “something else”, just wait to see what their folly will spawn this time. HOWEVER, we can be sure that they will do everything they can to not only support their voting base, but to expand that base by handing out even more “free” goodies to the professionally unemployed and the criminal element of the invasion forces. ( "those lovely people who are only trying to better themselves"). I could give a rather long explanation of the problem we are in, but I will just summerize it with this: When the dependant class reaches a point where the productive class can no longer support them, then a total collapse of the economy is inevitable. Are the “progressive liberals” so ignorant that they are incapable of understanding that law of economics, or is it their intent to bring this nation down to total ruin?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Featured Book
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
"Green Hell explains why Americans can't afford to fall for Al Gore's `the debate is over' line on global warming. While we're all for the environment, Green Hell explains why we need to oppose the environmentalists."
--Fred Barnes, Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard
"Green Hell is the `inconvenient truth' on extremist, growth-killing environmentalism. A must-read for those interested in keeping America free and prosperous."
--Steve Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes
"Regardless of whether you believe global warming is a fraud, the fact is that the current depression, the past spike in oil prices, and the coming technology of electric cars are all going to solve whatever problem exists. Liberals want to use climate change as an excuse to take over the economy and regulate everything and this book exposes their plans."
--Dick Morris, FOX News commentator and former political consultant to Bill Clinton
"This book describes why the world can't afford to fall for global warming alarmism and environmental hysteria. Steve Milloy shows how to avoid the environmentalists' vision of our future."
--VACLAV KLAUS, President of the European Union and President of the Czech Republic
"Free market capitalism is still the best path to prosperity. Green Hell is a must-read for anyone who wants to keep America on that path and away from Soviet-style command-and-control environmentalism."
--Larry Kudlow, Host, CNBC's The Kudlow Report
|
 |
|
 |
|