| Login      
 


 

Author: Drew Emmer Created: 9/30/2007
Blogging on the issues impacting our freedoms.

Meet The Transportation Mafia
By Drew Emmer on 2/27/2008

This morning Minnesotans were forced to muddled through another daily dose of predictable propaganda from the StarTribune. Letters to the editor read like a promotional package from the group of lobbyists and special interests that made the transportation bill happen this year. Lori Sturdivant criticizes any scrutiny of the six Republicans who abandoned their party and sided with the Democrats to override the Governor's veto.  Driving to my office this morning I heard a few different radio ads sanctifying the heroic victory for the people that the transportation bill passing so "definitely" represents.

Once again, media playing it's critical role in managing public opinion rather than reporting on it. The choreography is precise and the playbook shrewdly crafted. And it's all made to look like what happened last week in the legislature was the result of some organic grassroots effort to remedy our sick transportation system. If the people only knew the truth.

Surely every Minnesotan deserves to know the real players behind the power and influence exerted in Minnesota. This is all public information so it can't be corrupt, right? Weigh the details for yourself. Make up your own mind.

Let's take a look at the "powers that be" behind the scenes on this shrewdly crafted outcome "for" Minnesota.  Let's start with the Transportation Alliance.

Ames Construction
Parsons Brickerhoff
Bonestroo
HDR
HTNB
Short Elliott Hendriksen
SRF Consulting
3M Worldwide
WSB
Ayers Associates
Bolton & Menk Surveyors
Amalgamated Transit Union
URS Corporation
MN Building Trades Council (AFL-CIO)
International Union Of Operating Engineers Local 49
Jacobs, Edwards & Kelsey
Teamsters Local 120

Now lets take a look at the massive mob of organizations under the advertising campaign I heard this morning under the Progress In Motion moniker:

Professional Associations

The Minnesota Transportation Alliance
A statewide coalition of approximately 275 public and private sector organizations involved in the development, construction and operation of Minnesota’s transportation system. Alliance members include most of the 87 Minnesota counties, cities, the highway industry, transit organizations, unions and other transportation advocates.

Associated General Contractors of Minnesota
The AGC is a non-profit professional trade association consisting of 450 members that is dedicated to promoting opportunity and excellence in the building and highway construction industry.

Minnesota Public Transit Association
Statewide Association consisting of over 60 transit systems statewide and other transit advocates.

Minnesota State Patrol Troopers Association
City Engineers Association – Represents 142 cities
County Engineers Association – Represents all 87 county engineers
American Council of Engineering Companies of Minnesota - ACEC/MN’s 150+ member firms represent over 4,500 employees and over $350 million in annual gross billings.
Minnesota Asphalt Pavement Association - Approximately 29 asphalt producers along with 7 asphalt nonproducers and 95+ associate members.
Concrete Paving Association of Minnesota – Represents approximately 70 member companies
Aggregate Ready Mix Association
Minnesota Utility Contractors Association
North Central Cement Council

Local Government

Minnesota Association of Townships
Minnesota Inter-County Association
Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities
North Metro Mayors Association
North Metro I-35W Corridor Coalition
Highway 14 Partnership
Highway 52 Freeway Partnership
Highway 55 Coalition
City of Hutchinson
City of Minneapolis
City of St. Michael
Beltrami County
Blue Earth County
Lyon County
Ramsey County
Agricultural Groups
Broiler and Egg Association of Minnesota
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
Land Stewardship Project
Minnesota Association of Cooperatives
Minnesota Barley Growers Association
Minnesota Farmers Union
Minnesota Food Association
Minnesota Land Trust
Minnesota Turkey Growers Association
Minnesota Wheat Growers Association
Northern Plains Potato Growers Association

Other Supporters

Alliance for Metropolitan Stability
Brain Injury Association of Minnesota
Growth & Justice
ISAIAH
League of Women Voters Minnesota
Marshall Area Chamber of Commerce /Transportation Committee
Minnesota Consortium For Citizens With Disabilities
Minnesota Public Interest Research Group
Minnesota Senior Federation
Transit for Livable Communities
Unions
AFSCME Council 5
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49
Laborers District Council of Minnesota and North Dakota
Minnesota AFL-CIO
Minnesota State Building & Construction Trades Council
North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters
Teamsters Local 120
United Transportation Union
Environmental Organizations
Alliance for Sustainability
Conservation Fund
Conservation Minnesota
Fresh Energy
Friends of the Mississippi River
Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness
Institute for Local Self – Reliance
Izaak Walton League – Minnesota Division
Lower Phalen Creek Project
Mankato Area Environmentalists
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
Minnesota Conservation Federation
Minnesota Council Trout Unlimited
Minnesota Environmental Partnership
Minnesota Food Association
Minnesota Land Trust
National Environmental Trust, Minnesota
Sierra Club
Sustainable Farming Association of Minnesota
Will Steger Foundation
Windustry
Businesses
Aggregate Industries
American Engineering Testing
Ames Construction
AVR
Bituminous Roadways
Bolton & Menk Inc
Bonestroo
Braun Intertec Corporation
Central Specialties Inc
Century Fence Company
CS McCrossan, Inc.
Cemstone
CitiCapital Construction Equipment Finance
Cobb Strecker Dunphy & Zimmerman Inc.
Dahl Trucking Inc
Duininck Brothers Construction
Eagan Connection, LLC
Edward Kraemer and Sons
Erickson Engineering
Frattalone Companies
Geyer Signal
Hardrives
HDR Engineering Inc
Highway Technologies
HNTB
Hoover Construction
Intex Corporation
Jacobs Edwards and Kelcey
J.D.P. Safety Consulting LLC
Kadrmas Lee & Jackson
KGM Contractors Inc.
Knife River Corp
L.H. Sowles Inc.
LHB Inc
Lunda Construction
Martin Marietta Materials
Master Engineering, Real Estate and Construction
Mathiowetz Construction Company
McCarty Group
Midwest Asphalt
R and G Construction
Rachel Contracting
Riley Brothers Construction Inc.
Road Machinery and Supplies Company
Robert Schroeder Construction
Ryan Companies US Inc
Sellin Brothers
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc
Simcote Inc.
SRF Consulting Group Inc
Stellar Contracting Inc.
TCC Materials
TKDA
Tiller Corporation
Tower Asphalt
Ulland Brothers, Inc
Valley Paving
WSB and Associates
Ziegler Inc.

How cool is it that you can lobby for legislation that delivers beefy state contracts to your business?  And in the case of many of these organizations, using taxpayer money to do so.  Minnesota taxpayers should be outraged.

Comments (5)

Vast Majority of Minnesotans Have Health Insurance
By Drew Emmer on 2/1/2008

Centralizing health care under a government-controlled system management is shaping up to be a hotly contested issue in the 2008 Minnesota legislative session.  Liberal advocates of socialized medicine are trying to convince us that our health care system is broken. They claim that 47,000,000 Americans are without health care coverage.  But does their propaganda meet the smell test?

The Census Bureau has acknowledged their 2007 report stating that there are 47 million uninsured Americans is grossly overstated.  The fact is that 17,800,000 of that 47,000,000 used in the liberal argument are actually able to afford their own private coverage, but choose not to buy it for themselves.  Another 10 million of the 47 million are not citizens of the U.S.  Another 10 million do not work at all.  When you sort through all of the fuzzy math, at most there are 19 million people in America without health care coverage.  That's 7% of the total population.  What was the percentage of uninsured in 1987?

Comments (0)

Illegal Immigrants May Get Federal Stimulus Money
By Drew Emmer on 1/30/2008

As immoral as the concept of amnesty for illegals is in the minds of most Americans, Congress is poised to deliver economic stimulus cash into the hands of illegal aliens. Have vote hungry liberal politicians lost their minds?

According to Fox News, "The $146 billion stimulus package intended to jolt the economy by giving taxpayers rebates up to $1,200 includes cash returns for illegal immigrants who pay taxes.

Under the plan passed by the House, illegal immigrants who qualify as “resident aliens” and earned a minimum of $3,000 would be eligible for rebates of between $300-$600.

Only those illegals who have been assigned an Individual Tax Identification Number (TIN) that allows them to file income taxes would be eligible. The basic issue comes down to how the IRS has defined "resident aliens". The IRS defines a resident alien as somone who satifies one of two tests. The "green card" test is used for individuals who are in the United States legally. The problem is with the "substantial presence" test which defines a resident alien as someone who spend a “substantial” amount of time in the U.S. and have not been deported -- illegal aliens.  The Center for Immigration Studies issued a white paper entitled "Giving Cover to Illegal Aliens" in 2002 discussing how the IRS is undermining US immigration law by issuing Individual Tax Identification Numbers to illegal aliens. 

Tom Tancredo picked up on it here and here. The Politico has picked up on it here. Now some politicians are running around like their hair is on fire trying to figure out "how did THIS happen?" News flash to the politicians... It is called the law of unintended consequences.

You can weigh-in on the issue by contacting your U.S. Senators and asking them to be sure not to adopt the House version of the stimulus package.

Comments (5)

The State of Minnesota's Republican Party and Conservative Movement
By Drew Emmer on 1/22/2008

Today the University of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs Center for the Study of Politics and Governance (CSPG) hosted a panel discussion entitled "The State of Minnesota's Republican Party and Conservative Movement."

Video Clips From The Forum (Double Click on Video to View Full-Sized Version)

 Forum Highlights Video

 Cooper Detailed Comments

 Swiggum Detailed Comments

CSPG states that they work to develop practical solutions to pressing political and policy challenges. The CSPG says that they provide non-partisan research and forums to foster more effective and efficient governance, increase the transparency of government processes, and rebuild public trust in order to counteract negative influences that threaten our democracy.

The panel was moderated by Professor Larry Jacobs and consisted of former MN GOP chairman Bill Cooper, State Representative Mary Liz Holberg, Former Speaker of the House and current Commissioner of Labor and Industry Steve Swiggum and the executive director of Wellstone Action Jeff Blodgett.

What was scheduled to be a 90-minute forum ended at the one hour mark when Bill Cooper abruptly stood-up and left the meeting without any further explanation from Cooper or moderator Jacobs. The forum was not well attended and there was no apparent mainstream media coverage.

Considering the brevity of what portended to be an important panel discussion about the condition of one of Minnesota's major political parties and the philosophical movement that sustains it, some worthwhile observations were elucidated by the panel.

Bill Cooper identified three factions within the Republican Party (economic, social, and military conservatives). Cooper said that he believed no current presidential candidate represented all three viewpoints. However, he believes that these values are not mutually exclusive and that a candidate can, in fact, express support in all three areas. Smaller, less intrusive government is common to all three groups, but no candidate is running on that fundamental common position. Independents are key votes that are not necessarily moderates. They have strong views on a variety of issues. They are largely "disaffected voters". They naturally dislike politicians. Conservative candidates think they need to moderate their positions to win the Independent vote. But that only exacerbates the problem for Independents. Do what you promise to do - that type of consistency and integrity is favored over agreement on all issues. Independents will vote for a candidate they disagree with, but they will not vote for a candidate that seems dishonest. The largest group of the populous considers themselves to be Conservatives. John McCain is Cooper's favored candidate because he has been the most consistent in his positions.

Mary Liz Holberg spoke on the character of Conservatism. It’s about people, not government. The focus is on individual liberties, individual responsibilities and individual accountability. Does the Party remain a vehicle for the Conservative movement? Unequivocally, yes. Democrats are also divided. There is a strong Libertarian streak on both sides of the aisle (i.e. Rukavina on smoking ban, Pete Nelson onprivacy of individual information). The process is largely about circular issues (i.e., life, marriage, etc.) versus linear issues (i.e., taxes, welfare reform, transportation, transit, etc.).  Nuance, while often attempted by politicians, is not possible with linear issues. Inside the Party, there is a battle going on that will be answered in the short-term by the presidential election. The greatest danger is to turn-off Conservatives. The Republican Party of Minnesota is the vehicle for the Conservative movement. However the vehicle has been running rough and needs a tune-up.  Everything ultimately depends on the quality and the character of leadership.

Steve Swiggum said "I tend to believe in balance, especially in governing. Radical extreme ends of the philosophical spectrum try to move the whole scrum in one direction or the other. The popular soundbyte subject of 'change' is disengenouous. No candidate is talking about specific changes or solutions. But they repeat 'change' and 'hope' constantly. Where is the hope for change? If change is what you want, the only possibility comes from the Republican Party. I've come to see that the Democratic Party is so controlled by special interests, that there is no room for any change. The Democrats cannot reform education because of the teacher’s union. They can't reform the courts because of the trial lawyers association. They can't privatize anything or reform anything in the government because of AFSCME and SEIU. Democrats can't do it because of their inherent complicity with special interests. Republicans won't even try to do it because frankly, they are scared. To capture independent voters we have to bring forth the message that Republicans are the only hope for real change. And we need to follow with specifics. Fiscal prudence must be at the center. Individual responsibility is a critical theme. Then layer in all the various factions. Rely on the market.

Jeff Blodgett introduced himself by recalling an introduction by presidential candidate James Stockdale "Who am I? Why am I here?" Blodgett suggested that he belonged in the discussion because when you pull ideology out of the equation then we are talking about the tension between movements and parties. We've (Liberals) watched and studied the Republicans. '64-'94 was the coming out of the wilderness period that ran up to the Gingrich resolution. That was a 30 year process. From '94-'00 winning a governing majority was a superlative outcome. Then came the '04 banter about a "permanent Republican majority", uncontrolled hubris, and the subsequent crash of the party across the board. Over-reaching, hubris, fragmenting.  That’s what is wrong with the GOP. You win with candidates who believe in something and communicate that belief. Galvanize a base. Then go get the plurality or majority needed to win. It comes down to the quality of the candidates. It's much easier to be out of power and push from the outside. If you want to maintain power you have to be careful with your ideology.

Comments (2)

Governor Unveils Sweeping Immigration Proposals
By Drew Emmer on 1/7/2008

This afternoon Governor Tim Pawlenty held a press conference detailing his vision for immigration reform and enforcement in Minnesota.  Appearing with Department of Public Safety Commissioner and Minnesota Homeland Security Chief Michael Campion, Pawlenty issued four Executive Orders for immediate implementation and five legislative proposals to be acted upon as soon as the legislature is called to order in February.

This is arguably the boldest exertion of executive power by Governor Pawlenty in recent memory.  His vision for immigration reform was met with fierce opposition from liberal reporters and an incensed hispanic legislator, Patricia Torres-Ray (DFL, Minneapolis), who held her own impromptu press conference in the hallway after the Governor's presentation.

Pawlenty issued the following four executive orders with his signature today:

1. Minnesota law enforcement officers will work with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to help enforce immigration laws.

2. New state emplyees and contractors doing business with the state will be required to verify citizenship through an Internet-based system operated by the federal governmnet.

3. Department of Public Safety will conduct a review of Minnesota driver license database to catch duplicate photos and examine for possible fraud.

4. Department of Public Safety will coordinate law enforcement summits to coordinate training in targeting criminal activity related to illegal immigration.

The five legislative proposals include prohibition of city "sanctuary" ordinances, strengthened human trafficking laws, enhanced penalties for employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants, increased penalties for identity theft and establishing the crime of "aggravated forgery" of underlying documents used to obtain legitimate identity documents.

Comments (34)

House Minority Leadership Proposes Free Market Health Care
By Drew Emmer on 12/11/2007

House Minority Leader Marty Seifert and Representative Jim Abeler, the ranking minority member of the Health & Human Services Committee, held a press conference this morning unveiling a new proposal for health care reform. The core principles advanced in the proposal included Freedom and Choice; Privacy and Security; and No Government Takeover of Health Care.

 Press Conference Video

 Interview with Rep. Marty Seifert

 Interview with Rep Jim Abeler

 "The health care issue is complicated and we must be very clear to avoid any confusion about our values,” said Rep. Abeler. To that end, the legislators said that the press conference would help set the stage for more specific forums on health care in the near future.

Most mainstream news organizations gave scant press coverage of the conference.  As such, we decided to provide more information by posting videos of the actual press conference and follow-up interviews with Reps. Seifert and Abeler.

We have extended an invitation to DFL legislative leaders to offer them the opportunity to state their positions on health care.

Comments (5)

Nine States Now Offer Illegals In-State Tuition - Will Minnesota Be Next?
By Drew Emmer on 12/5/2007

Nine states have passed laws allowing illegal immigrants to attend colleges and universities for the same cost as a legal in-state resident.  Are American students being unfairly biased by this arguably "illegal" competition for a coveted slot in class?

California, Illinois, Kansas, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Washington currently offer illegal immigrants in-state tuition rates.  American citizens that attend school outside of the state of their primary residence are, in many cases, required to pay almost twice as much tuition as illegal immigrants.

Under U.S. law, illegal immigrants may not hold any job in the United States.  That raises the question as to why we would offer educational advantages to the very people we prohibit from having a legitimate job in our country.  Students without legal immigrant status continue to be ineligible for federal financial aid, although states are required to provide K-12 public education as a result of a 1982 Supreme Court decision.

The Wall Street Journal raised the possibility that the whole in-state tuition benefit for illegal aliens issue has been nothing more than a vote buying ploy for politicians appealing to hispanic illegals:

"Promoters expect few students to actually take up the benefit. Dropout rates are high and academic scores generally are low among Hispanics, who account for the majority of illegal aliens. "

 In-state tuition for illegal aliens is a violation of Federal Law.  Federal Law Title 8, Chapter 14, Sec. 1623 states:

"an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State... for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit."

In-state tuition for illegals is in fact a form of amnesty masquerading as an incentive for education.

 

Comments (8)

Colorado Supreme Court Ruling Begs Personhood Question For The Unborn
By Drew Emmer on 11/16/2007

Colorado pro-life activists recently made significant progress in challenging the validity of the 1973 U.S Supreme Court rulling of Roe v. Wade.  The Colorado Supreme Court voted unanimously to allow a group called Colorado for Equal Rights to conduct a petition drive for a ballot initiative to establish personhood for the unborn.

The right to life is a fundamental principle of the U.S Constitution.   Minnesota's constitution likewise states, "Government is instituted for the security, benefit and protection of the people..." (Minnesota Constitution Article I).  Most Minnesotans support the idea of banning public funding for abortion, if not outlawing the procedure entirely.

Although Minnesota is not an initiative and referendum state, this victory in Colorado is clearly a harbinger of a new wave of optimism for the defenders of the unborn in Minnesota.   We will keep a close eye on the progress of this initiative in Colorado and inform you of additional developments as they occur.

 

Comments (0)

Are You Ready To Surrender Your Personal Freedoms To The Government?
By Drew Emmer on 11/15/2007

Citizens' Council on Health Care (CCHC) helped frame the debate on health care in Minnesota at its "Aiming High For Health Care In 2008" Conference.  The well-attended seminar was hosted by KTLK 100.3FM conservative Talk Show Host Jason Lewis.  CCHC brought together a diverse group of medical professionals, insurance industry leaders, expert speakers, politicians and community leaders.  Keynote speaker Dr. David Gratzer from Canada spoke of how Canada's univeral healthcare system is resulting in the rationing of healthcare in that country.  He has recently released a book entitled "The Cure - How Capitalism Can Cure American Health Care" in which he presents his case for free-markets solutions to the healthcare dilemma facing our nation.

Comments (0)

Founder's Quote of the Week

"But as the plan of the convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments would clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, EXCLUSIVELY delegated to the United States." --Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 32

  Print    Minimize
 

Our Bookstore
    Minimize
 

 
September 03, 2010
 
YOU ARE HERE:    Home
Copyright 2007 - 2009 by Minnesota Majority
Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement
web security