| Login      
 


 

Get Ready for the Misery Tour
Jeff's Blog By Jeff Davis on 2/17/2009

By Phil Krinke, Minnesota Taxpayer's Leauge

This week the Minnesota “Misery Tour” will be making a stop in a town near you. The “Misery Tour” is just like any traveling road show, a well orchestrated event with a clear objective. The show has been in the works for weeks, the Senate and House DFL leadership carefully planning the locations and the venues. Putting out the word to the right people to ensure they have the correct sound bites at each location.

The “Misery Tour” is scheduled to make stops in at least 24 cities across Minnesota. To date, the list includes: Albert Lea, Alexandria, Bemidji, Bloomington, Brainerd, Burnsville, Coon Rapids, Duluth, Forest Lake, Little Falls, Mankato, Marshall, Minneapolis, Moorhead, Plymouth, Rochester, St. Cloud, St. Paul, Virginia, Willmar, Winona, White Bear Lake, Woodbury and Worthington.

What’s the purpose of the “Misery Tour”? It’s to let average Minnesotans across the state comment on Governor Pawlenty’s proposed budget. Does any one honestly think that after a mere three weeks since it was laid on the table, that an “average” Minnesotan has read, reviewed, or grasped what is in the Governor’s proposed 2010-2011 state budget? So let’s call it like it is….this is a staged show for the media so that DFL legislative leaders can have an endless parade of pre-selected folks whine about the horrible impact the Governor’s proposed budget will have on their schools, their cities, their government jobs, you fill in the blank. The room will be filled with people who either work for government or are benefiting from a government program, telling their tale of woe if they don’t get a pay increase or if their government program funding is reduced.

Do legislators really need to go to 24 cities across the state and listen to a pre-screened set of whiners tell them what they already believe, “they don’t like Governor Pawlenty’s budget proposal.”

Why do we need the “Misery Tour” when most legislators have already scheduled their own local town hall meetings in their respective legislative districts all over the state with their own little dog and pony shows? Instead of the “Misery Tour,” maybe legislative leaders should stay in St. Paul and see if they can come up with their own budget solution.

When House Speaker Margaret Kelliher was asked why the House leadership had no concrete budget proposals of their own on the table, she responded that the Legislature did not have the resources and that it was “unrealistic to expect us to respond in just a few days.” Well, the Speaker might have more time and resources to devote toward a proposed budget if she wasn’t sponsoring the “Misery Tour.”

But as they say in the entertainment business the “show must go on” and if you are looking for some good entertainment this week stop in on the “Misery Tour” when it comes to a town near you, but don’t forget to sign up before you go, otherwise you won’t be able to speak. Remember only those who have a negative comment about the Governor’s budget will be allowed to speak or address the elected officials in attendance.

My suggested change for the “Misery Tour” road show that could actually turn these staged events into a real listening tour is this… “Only allow individuals, who aren’t government workers, or people who aren’t currently receiving a government check or individuals who aren’t receiving a direct government subsidy to speak.” This would allow our elected officials to hear from people who don’t have a vested interest or a lobbyist at the State Capitol. With this stipulation, “average Minnesotans” could let legislators know what impact a tax increase might have on their families and while Governor Pawlenty’s budget may not be perfect, it indeed might be preferable to a yet to be disclosed DFL budget solution. Without a biased audience, legislators might hear from Minnesotans who don’t want a hand-out, but only want government’s hand out of their pocket. 

TAKE ACTION: 

The official legislative "listening sessions" are done.  But we have launched a "Virtual Listening Session" to make sure the voices of private sector taxpayers are heard.  Click here to participate.

Comments (3)

Thwarting the Will of the Majority, Committee Blocks Voter ID Bill
Dan's Blog By Dan McGrath on 2/12/2009


Lucky Rosenbloom testifies in support of Photo ID.

Poll after poll consistently demonstrates the overwhelming majority of Minnesotans want a photo ID requirement to vote. A bill that would have made that wish reality (HF 57) got a shot at the big time today, but was ultimately defeated in the House Government Operations Committee. By a vote of 11-8 the committee decided not to refer the bill to the Public Safety Committee, stopping it dead in it’s tracks. Every “no” vote was a Democrat, but not every “yes” vote was a Republican. Newcomer, Phil Sterner broke ranks with his party and voted to refer the bill to the next committee.
 
Chairman Pelowski (D-31A), Representatives Poppe (D-27B), Hilty (D-8A), Hornstein (D-60B), Kahn (D-59B), Kalin (D-17B), Marquart (D-9B), Morrow (D-23A), Nelson (D-46A), Simon (D-44A) and Winkler (D-44B) voted to kill photo ID.
 
Representatives Emmer (R-19B), Anderson (R-13A), Buesgens (R-35B), Gottwalt (R-15A), Kiffmeyer (R-16B), Lanning (R-9A), Sanders (R-51A) and Sterner (D-37B) voted to pass the bill out of committee.
 
Secretary of State Ritchie, who has recently proposed a wide array of new voting initiatives, including opening up in-person early voting for several days before the election testified that requiring ID would substantially increase the need for judges at the polls. He said the extra judges could cost up to $800,000 a year. Election judges who were present and testified contradicted Ritchie, saying Photo ID would actually streamline the process and wouldn’t require any extra judges. Ritchie’s own proposals do require extra judges, however, and at substantially higher cost than the pittance he suggests would be required to implement Photo ID. In today’s government, any price tag that isn’t measured in millions or billions of dollars may as well be pennies as far as legislators are concerned.
 
Former Secretary of State and current committee member, Representative Mary Kiffmeyer said that when she had Ritchie’s job, her office ran the numbers and determined that even in the face of budget cuts and unallotment, her office could absorb the negligible costs of issuing free IDs to the poor and managing any infrastructure changes into her existing budget.
 

Well-to-do, white, male DFL legislators argued that voter ID would disenfranchise minority groups. Maryland “Lucky” Rosenbloom, a respected leader in the black community refuted that notion in his testimony. He said current document requirements for identity verification are confusing, poorly understood and difficult for many to meet. He argued that everyone knowing that photo ID is the standard would simplify the process and eliminate confusion. He held up a utility bill addressed to “Lucky” Rosenbloom, noting “I can vote with my nickname using this utility bill, but this ID has my full legal name,” and “I'm gong to have my ID in my pocket, every day. I don't keep this utility bill in my pocket every day. It's very empowering to walk in and say, here's my ID. You can't turn me away now.”

 

Take Action

Comments (3)

House Hearing on Photo ID Bill This Thursday
Jeff's Blog By Jeff Davis on 2/10/2009

The Photo ID bill (HF57 / SF0146) will be heard  this Thursday by the Government Operations and Elections Committee in the Minnesota House of Representatives. This bill would require you to present a photo ID in order to vote on Election Day.   Polls show a supermajority of Minnesotans support such a law. But liberal legislators are opposed to it. It would appear they want to perpetuate an election system that invites error and abuse because they feel its offers them a political advantage.

 

Concerned citizens should contact the following committee members to ask them to support the bill.  CLICK HERE to review some common excuses given by our opponents prior to making your calls.

Name Phone
Rep. Phillip Sterner 651-296-4306
Rep. Jeremy Kalin 651-296-5377
Rep. Paul Marquart 651-296-6829
Rep. Terry Morrow 651-296-8634
Rep. Jeanne Poppe 651-296-4193
Rep. Bill Hilty 651-296-4308

We also need dozens of volunteers to show-up at Thursday's hearing to show support for the Voter ID bill.  CLICK HERE if you are able to join us at 8:00AM on Thursday morning  in St. Paul.

Comments (2)

Budget Hawks Jam & Bash - Thursday Night at Trocadero's
Dan's Blog By Dan McGrath on 2/2/2009

Budget Hawks Jam & BashJoin in the fight to protect our wallets and reduce state government spending. Minnesota Majority, together with like-minded organizations, is sponsoring the Budget Hawk’s Jam & Bash at Trocadero’s Night Club in Minneapolis on Thursday, February 5 from 5:00 - 8:00p.m.

Gather together with like-minded neighbors, have some refreshments, and meet political leaders. Learn more about what you can do to fight liberal lawmakers who want to increase spending and raise our taxes.

Click here to see a flyer for the event.  Here’s a link with a map to Trocadero’s and  here’s a link with a map for parking.  Hope to see you Thursday night.

Comments (0)

Governor’s Budget Proposals Miss an Opportunity for Long Term Solutions
Dan's Blog By Dan McGrath on 1/28/2009

Governor Tim PawlentyWhile the governor’s recent proposals to solve the looming $6 billion state budget deficit do not include any tax increases, as he promised, his plan comes up short on lasting solutions. The governor’s plan relies on one-time (and indeterminate) bailout money from the federal government, borrowing and tapping the cash reserves of the Health Care Access fund. These are all stopgap measures that may or may not help solve the current biennium’s budget woes, but do nothing to provide needed long-term stability in the state's finances.

While the governor’s plan relies heavily on these one-time stopgap solutions, there are some spending reductions in the package. The governor has proposed approximately $2.3 billion in spending cuts. All major areas of the state budget are slated to be scaled back except the two largest budget items, K-12 education and Health & Human Services. Those two items combined make up almost 70% of the general fund budget and the governor proposes increased spending in each. K-12 education is slated for a funding boost above and beyond the current budget plan. Governor Pawlenty proposes a permanent per-pupil formula increase of $300 or 5% to get districts not utilizing his performance pay plan, “Q Comp,” on board with that program. He’d also like to give high-performing districts a 2% bump in the general education funding formula. Health & Human Services would get a 9.6% increase over the current biennium.

$287 million in tax cuts are also included in the governor’s plan, with the objective of creating and preserving jobs. He proposed a reduction in the state’s highest corporate tax rate, providing an up front sales tax exemption for new business equipment purchases and accelerated write-off of the depreciation tax deduction on such equipment. These seem like good ideas to try to stave off or reduce the impact of rising unemployment (presently projected to exceed 10% by the end of the year).

There are some positive aspects of the governor’s budget proposals, but the overall plan misses an opportunity to examine the entire state budget situation and make permanent reforms to create a common sense and sustainable budget that wouldn’t go out of whack every other biennium. It’s a temporary political move designed to, as much as possible, maintain the status quo without hiking taxes. Even if all the what-ifs fall in to place and the current budget crisis is dealt with by these proposals, the same ugly problem will resurface in the 2012-2013 biennium. In that respect, the governor’s critics are justified in accusations of band-aid solutions and budgetary gimmicks.

It’s past time Minnesota face reality and wrestle with our out of control spending problem. Budget increases are on auto-pilot, and growing at a rate that far outpaces normal inflation. The present course is unsustainable. The sooner we can change the budget’s tack, the better.

Take Action: Submit your budget-balancing ideas and comments at MinnesotaBudgetSolutions.com.

Additional Resources

Comments (3)

House Legislators Introduce Voter Photo ID Bill
Dan's Blog By Dan McGrath on 1/26/2009

Several House lawmakers gathered for a press conference on Monday to introduce HF 57, a new bill that will require Minnesota voters to provide picture identification before receiving a ballot. Representatives Tom Emmer, Paul Kohls, Dan Severson and Mary Kiffmeyer authored the bill.

The bill also includes provisional ballots for those who may have forgotten their ID, or need more time to obtain proper identification and a clause that will provide free ID for voters who do not have and can’t afford state-issued Identification.

This bill is one great step towards improving confidence in the integrity of Minnesota’s elections. A recent survey found that 85% of Minnesotans favor the photo ID requirement that will be established by this legislation. Dozens of supporters turned out with signs advocating election reform and packed the House Press Conference Room.

The bill will be heard first in the House State and Local Government Operations, Reform, Technology and Elections Committee.

Take Action: Three Ways to Get Involved

Additional Resources: Click here to listen to the podcast of Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer discussing the voter ID bill on the Dan Conry show.

Comments (0)

Coalition Formed To Gather Input on Budget
Dan's Blog By Dan McGrath on 1/23/2009

A group of non-partisan, non-profit organizations have formed a coalition that will be gathering suggestions to solve Minnesota’s current $4.8 billion shortfall.  The coalition is seeking methods that can solve the states budget problems without adding to the tax burden of families and small businesses.

The coalition is asking for proposals from policy experts and ordinary citizens in order to begin a constructive dialogue for real budget solutions.  A new website has been launched at MinnesotaBudgetSolutions.com where anyone can help identify opportunities to restructure state spending and comment on budget proposals. 

"The partners in this coalition range include members of the construction industry to family advocacy groups," said Pat Anderson, President of the Free Market Institute.  "Our goal is to make sure that during the state budget process that the day to day challenges of average families are considered when proposed tax increases and spending reductions are offered up."

Members of the coalition include; Associated Builders and Contractors, Minnesota Family Council, Minnesota Free Market Institute, Minnesota Majority, the Minnesota chapter of the National Federation of Independent Businesses, Taxpayers League of Minnesota, and Campaign for Liberty.

"Our object is to understand and develop opportunities to better allocate state funds, and then seek common sense solutions that won’t add to the burden Minnesota families already bear," said Jeff Davis, President of Minnesota Majority.  "Minnesota is home to some of the best and brightest individuals.  If we roll up our sleeves and work together, we can accomplish this goal."

Take Action: Visit MinnesotaBudgetSolutions.com to add your ideas about how to balance the state's budget.

Comments (0)

Thousands March for Life
Jeff's Blog By Jeff Davis on 1/22/2009

Courtesy of MCCL press release: Nearly five thousand Minnesotans marched at the State Capitol today to urge lawmakers not to cut the crucial Positive Alternatives program providing practical, essential help for pregnant women in need. They also called for an end to coerced abortions in which women experience pressure or physical violence. The annual Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL) March for Life commemorates the millions of lives lost to abortion.
The 2009 MCCL March for Life marked the 36th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decisions that have resulted in the deaths of more than 530,000 unborn Minnesota children, and more than 50 million unborn babies nationwide. In addition, recent research from the Elliot Institute shows that nearly two-thirds of post-abortive women report that coercion was a factor in their abortions.

“No woman should ever be forced into abortion—not by relatives, the child’s father or abortionists,” MCCL Legislative Associate Jordan Bauer told the huge crowd of citizens from across the state. “We have legislation this year to stop coerced abortions. Abortion is not a choice, because no baby would ever choose to die.”

MCCL called upon lawmakers to preserve full funding for Positive Alternatives as they deliberate over the budget deficit. Passed in 2005, this legislation provides grants to organizations that help pregnant women successfully face the challenges of pregnancy and childbirth. More than 12,000 women received critical help in the program’s first two years. “Positive Alternatives saves lives,” Bauer explained. “We must save the Positive Alternatives program!”
MCCL’s 2008 legislative agenda also calls for a ban on sex-selection and saline abortions, as well as a ban on taxpayer funding of abortion. In 2006 (most recent figures), Minnesotans were forced to pay $1.6 million for elective abortions, according to the Minnesota Department of Human Services. Taxpayers now fund 28 percent of all abortions in the state.

MCCL will oppose the Reproductive Privacy Act, S.F. 115, which would nullify virtually all protective laws, including informed consent under Woman’s Right to Know and the state’s parental notification provision. Several of Minnesota’s pro-life elected officials offered words of support to the state’s pro-life majority. Prolife Gov. Tim Pawlenty told the crowd that he was proud to stand with them in “the noble cause of affirming the culture of life.” Pawlenty also urged the Legislature to maintain full funding for Positive Alternatives. “We should all be able to come together to promote positive alternatives to abortion in Minnesota and America.”

The Hon. Norm Coleman spoke to the thousands of pro-life citizens, saying that Roe v. Wade “compromised” the right to life guaranteed in the Declaration of Independence. “Every nation is defined by how it treats its most vulnerable citizens,” Coleman declared. “Who is more vulnerable that the unborn?”

TAKE ACTION: Sign the petition calling for an end to taxpayer-funded abortions in Minnesota

Comments (0)

Live from the Minnesota Majority Bunker: Dan Conry is On the Air
Dan's Blog By Dan McGrath on 1/15/2009

Dan ConryCommon Sense Radio returns to Minnesota's airwaves on Monday, January 19th. Dan Conry's new syndicated show will be broadcast live weekday mornings from 7:00 to 9:20 on KRWC, Radio for Wright County AM 1360.

Conry's new program based on common-sense conservatism and having a good time while discussing the issues of the day will be streamed live on the internet and podcast from DanConry.com.

Raised in Flatbush Brooklyn in what he calls his crazy Irish family, Dan developed his street smarts & well known self deprecating sense of humor on the streets of New York. Dan joined the NYPD in the 1980s. After several years as a street cop in Brooklyn, he became an undercover narcotics Detective in Manhattan. Dan retired from the NYPD and moved to Minnesota after an injury in the line of duty.

Dan says he's bringing some familiar characters to the new program. Super Dave Harrigan will produce the show and Bill Snyder will be sitting in from time to time.

Minnesota Majority is happy to have Dan as a new neighbor in the bunker. The Dan Conry Show will be broadcast from the brand new Minnesota Majority studio. Don't miss it!

Take Action: Tune in to Dan Conry Monday, January 19th from 7:00 to 9:20 AM.

Comments (4)

Coleman – Franken Mess Underscores Need for Election Reforms
Dan's Blog By Dan McGrath on 1/8/2009
Just prior to last year’s election, Minnesota Majority released the results of an investigation which suggested a number of significant flaws in Minnesota’s election system. We cautioned the Secretary of State and other officials that apparent irregularities in Minnesota’s voter rolls, inconsistent data management practices and lax controls in voter registration could lead to doubts over the integrity of election results.
 
We couldn’t have predicted the near tie between Senator Coleman and challenger Al Franken but the potential for the aftermath that followed was clear. Two months after the election, Minnesota voters still don’t know who will represent their interests in the US Senate. Election-night returns indicated that Norm Coleman had won the election. But the recently completed hand-recount appears to have reversed this outcome and awarded the win to Al Franken. Norm Coleman is now challenging the results in District Court.
 
Secretary of State Mark Ritchie and other officials are reacting to the recount by asserting a need for relaxed election protocols. Specifically, they have recommended universal registration (registering to vote not required) and early voting (an expansion of absentee voting that allows people to vote early without offering a reason). But the nature of disputes in the recount suggests that absentee ballots and lax registration procedures were the source of most election irregularities. Rather than taking steps to tighten controls, these officials advocate taking the lock off the ballot box.
 
Minnesota’s election system already functions in such a way that it would, by its very nature, conceal most errors or abuse that may occur. Transparency depends on good recordkeeping and reliable data. Our current election system is flawed on both counts. The solution to the problem isn’t to reduce the security of the process. Relaxing voter registration requirements and expanding absentee voting may help to better conceal flaws in our election system, but these steps will not improve the system’s integrity, fairness or transparency. Instead, they would only further muddy the waters and increase doubts about the legitimacy of our election process. Rather, stronger identity and eligibility verification procedures are necessary to bolster the integrity of our election system.
 
All Minnesotans deserve to know that their honest vote is not being undermined by errors and abuse in the system. Common sense reform measures such as verifiable pre-Election Day registration, presentation of a photo ID and confirmation of the voter’s eligibility to vote prior to providing a ballot will serve to protect the right of all voters to have their legitimate votes equally counted. These steps would greatly improve election transparency by assuring quality, reliable data and verifiable voter identities.
 
The muddy waters of the Coleman – Franken election should serve as an example of why Minnesota needs stronger election data handling and verification procedures. While the Franken and Coleman camps have bickered over the eligibility of a few thousand absentee ballots, hundreds of thousands of ballots cast by unverified and untraceable same-day registrants are being indisputably accepted.
 
After every election, county officials are supposed to verify same-day registrants. Those who cannot be confirmed as legitimate, eligible voters are supposedly purged from the voter rolls. But their votes have already been counted and cannot be retrieved, no matter what is found after the fact.
 
Those who register on Election Day are subject to no real scrutiny or verification before their ballot is cast. Meanwhile, voters who register in advance of an election are subjected to a verification process. This is a shameful double-standard that gives preferential treatment to unverified voters.
 
Election reforms are needed, but not the sorts that perpetuate a mere illusion of fair elections. All voters have the right to equal treatment under the law. This means the state has a responsibility to ensure that each vote is counted and that only legitimate votes are cast. This is not now the case.
 
The simple and obvious solution that most Minnesotans support is to require photo ID at the polls. Election judges could verify the identity of every voter on the spot by simply asking for their ID, a practice that is currently not employed or even allowed in Minnesota. It’s been suggested that such a requirement would disenfranchise people who don’t possess a photo ID. To the contrary, photo ID requirements that have been implemented in other states provide for free ID cards to those who can’t afford one, which could easily be implemented in Minnesota for a nominal cost to the taxpayer. This could even potentially aid an underprivileged voter in becoming more integrated and functional in the mainstream. It’s extremely difficult to function in modern society without identification.

Before the election, Minnesota Majority and others warned officials that there were significant flaws in the voter registration rolls, data handling practices and other procedures that could lead to a cloud of doubt being cast over the election results. Coleman – Franken only reaffirms the need for common sense election reforms that offer true transparency, accountability and fairness for all. 

Take Action: Sign the Election Integrity Petition and send an instant message to your elected officials today.

Additional Resources

Minnesota Senator Ann Rest and Representative Laura Brod discuss election reforms on MPR's Midday:

 

 

Comments (2)

Founder's Quote of the Week

"But as the plan of the convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments would clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, EXCLUSIVELY delegated to the United States." --Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 32

  Print    Minimize
 

Our Bookstore
    Minimize
 

 
September 03, 2010
 
YOU ARE HERE:    Home
Copyright 2007 - 2009 by Minnesota Majority
Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement
web security