|
|
|
Largest-Ever Federal Payroll to Hit 2.15 million |
|
Jeff's Blog
|
By Jeff Davis on
2/3/2010
|
|
|
|
From the Washington Times
The era of big government has returned with a vengeance, in the form of the largest federal work force in modern history.
The Obama administration says the government will grow to 2.15 million employees this year, topping 2 million for the first time since President Clinton declared that "the era of big government is over" and joined forces with a Republican-led Congress in the 1990s to pare back the federal work force.
Most of the increases are on the civilian side, which will grow by 153,000 workers, to 1.43 million people, in fiscal 2010.
The expansion could provide more ammunition to those arguing that the government is trying to do too much under President Obama.
"I'm shocked that the 'tea party' hasn't focused on it yet, and the Obama administration only has a thin sliver of time to deal more directly with it, I believe," said Paul C. Light, who studies the federal bureaucracy as a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a professor at New York University. "When you talk about big government, you're talking about a big employer."
The new figures are contained in the budget that Mr. Obama sent Monday to Congress.
Read the rest of the story
|
 |
|
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
States' Secretaries of State Are Tipping Balance of Power |
|
Jeff's Blog
|
By Jeff Davis on
2/1/2010
|
|
|
|
 Election research being done by Minnesota Majority is receiving national attention. A story today by Fox News reports that Secretaries of State are being ushered into office by George Soros' Secretary of State Project in an effort to influence the outcomes of elections. One of the individuals featured in the Fox story is Minnesota's own Mark Ritchie who was elected with the help of Soros' organization and ACORN.
Fox reports on some of the many irregularities uncovered by Minnesota Majority's elections research, including felon voters and the fact that thousands more ballots were counted and certified by the Canvassing Board than Secretary Ritchie's voter registration system can account for in the 2008 general election.
The story raises the question of whether the outcome of the Coleman/Franken election contest may have had a different outcome if not for Mark Ritchie. Ritchie's response? "No comment."
TAKE ACTION
|
|
|
|
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
A Declaration of Health Care Independence |
|
Dan's Blog
|
By Dan McGrath on
1/29/2010
|
|
|
|
 Demand Real Health Care Reform
In his state of the union address, President Barack Obama tried to assure us that he had the right plan for America's future. He asked members of Congress to support his political agenda, including a government takeover of health care reform.
The American people spoke last summer when thousands attended town hall meetings across our nation. They spoke out again in the fall when nearly a million people marched on Washington. Most recently, the voters of Massachusetts spoke by electing a Republican to the US Senate for the first time in 60 years. But President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi STILL don't seem to be getting the message (see here).
Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann, together with other members of Congress, has unveiled the Declaration of Health Care Independence. The Declaration is a commitment to protect the rights of the American people to make their own health decisions, reduce bureaucratic red-tape, decrease intergenerational debt, and includes 10 common-sense principles that must be included in any future health care reforms.
Bachmann is calling on all concerned Americans to sign the Declaration and encourage their elected officials in Congress to do the same. Hopefully, Congressional leaders will finally get the message that it's time to start over and develop a set of common-sense health care reforms that have the support of the American people.
TAKE ACTION:
|
|
|
|
Comments (4)
|
|
|
|
|
A Victory for Freedom of Speech |
|
Jeff's Blog
|
By Jeff Davis on
1/25/2010
|
|
|
|
The Supreme Court campaign finance ruling last Thursday means corporations can spend freely on political ads leading up to elections. The Thursday decision invalidates portions of the 2002 McCain-Feingold campaign-finance reform law that sought to limit corporate influence. If you want to understand whether this decision was a positive development for everyday Americans, you need only look to the immediate reaction of those on the far Left -- elitists that want to speech to be controlled by government bureaucrats.
If you want to understand what was at stake in the Court's decision, watch the following 5 minute video produced by the CATO Institute.
|
|
|
|
Comments (1)
|
|
|
|
|
Majority Report: Election Integrity Part 2 |
|
Dan's Blog
|
By Dan McGrath on
1/18/2010
|
|
|
|
Conclusion of Davis Elections Interview
Drew Emmer concludes his interview of Minnesota Majority's president, Jeff Davis about the integrity of Minnesota's elections in this second installment.
The supreme court elections lawsuits is explained and Drew and Jeff break down all the research, findings and evidence.
Are the dead voting? What do we do about non-existent voter registration addresses and felons registering to vote? Are they voting and is anybody investigating? Find out the answers to these questions and learn more than anyone else will teach you about Minnesota's election system on the Minnesota Majority Report.
Additional resources:
Take Action:
|
|
|
|
Comments (1)
|
|
|
|
2010 Legislative Session Outlook |
|
Dan's Blog
|
By Dan McGrath on
1/12/2010
|
|
|
Legislative Outlook Holds Few Surprises. Budget Deficit and Jobs Top Priority Lists
Politics in Minnesota hosted a “Legislative Outlook,” panel this morning, featuring House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Senate Majority Leader Larry Pogemiller, Senate Minority Leader David Senjem and House Minority Leader Kurt Zellers. The event was moderated by TPT Channel 2’s Mary Lahammer. Representative Zellers suffered a flat tire on the way to the Sheraton but arrived in time to fully participate in the discussions.
It wasn’t much of a surprise that legislative leaders are in agreement on what the legislative session has in store and what the priority issues will be. Anyone who’s paying attention knows the state’s projected $1.2 billion budget deficit coming on the heels of last session’s even bigger shortfall has to be a top priority. The state’s structural budget problems and Minnesota’s economy are going to be front and center. Everyone talked about jobs, which is (in a somewhat rare convergence) exactly what these illustrious leaders’ constituents are talking about.
That the budget and jobs are top items to address is where the consensus ends, though. How best to deal with them, not surprisingly, broke down along party lines.
Moderator Mary Lahammer observed, “The old tax and spend argument.” Senator Poegamiller took exception to the remark, but as the discussion unfolded, it was apparent that Lahammer’s observation was apt. Some things never change. Democratic legislators argued that revenues (legislative code for taxes) have to be raised and resisted the idea that budget cuts are necessarily productive while the Republican leaders insisted that taxes shouldn’t be raised in our current economic environment. They advocated spending cuts. Representative Zellers noted that workers in the private sector are facing layoffs and wage cuts while state employees are getting raises. He said there has to be some shared sacrifice.
Speaker Kelliher stated that her legislative priorities this session will be #1 Jobs, #2 Restoring GAMC (General Assistance Medical Care) funding, #3 the Budget, though education cuts are off the table in her mind. There was general agreement among the panelists on these priorities.
As to ideas, Rep. Zellers and Rep. Kelliher made statements as to what they weren’t going to do. Kelliher said cuts to services were the same as a tax increase on the “most vulnerable” and families earning less than $40,000. Zellers, while advocating “growing” our way out of the deficit said we can’t give up-front equipment exemptions to businesses or cut corporate tax rates, because the money isn’t there.
Senator Senjem said his priorities were to protect K-12 spending, nursing homes, veterans and public safety budgets. "Everything else," he said, "is open to cuts."
For jobs creation, Speaker Kelliher suggested following the example of a Wisconsin government program called “The Network,” which provides step by step assistance to start-up businesses. She said it could cost as little as $200,000.
Senator Senjem suggested more public support for bio-sciences at the U of M and Mayo clinic as ways to stimulate the state’s economy. He said more U of M research would create a new stronger economy for Minnesota. Senjem also suggested that the legislature needed to focus on investing in areas he says Minnesota is strong in like renewable energy, citing biomass, wind and solar power as examples.
Senator Pogemiller said tax hikes wouldn’t hurt the jobs market or revenues, citing Delta Airlines’ recent move to increase bag-handling fees as an example of his reasoning. “Obviously, they wouldn’t do that unless the market could bear it,” he said.
Kelliher echoed Pogemiller’s philosophy, saying “budget cuts don’t keep jobs in Minnesota – History shows that the opposite is true.”
Nobody wanted to talk about funding a new Vikings stadium. When the question was raised, each of the four panelists said it wasn’t likely to be a priority and kept their answers short and vague. Senator Senjem and Rep. Zellers both mentioned a “Racino” as a possible funding source, but acknowledged such a plan wasn’t likely to pass or be signed by the governor.
Another issue briefly addressed by Speaker Kelliher was election reform. She said a bill would probably advance to move the state’s primary election up a month to comport with new federal legislation.
The one bright spot that stood out from the forum was a sense of general agreement that Minnesota's budget was structurally flawed and that a more permanent budget solution was needed, one that fundamentally reformed the way the state spends money. Senator Pogemiller summed up the notion saying, "We're in a state of denial about the budget. It's factual that we have to bring the cost structure down."
|
|
|
|
Comments (4)
|
|
|
|
Balanced Budget Amendment Will Do Just That |
|
Dan's Blog
|
By Dan McGrath on
1/12/2010
|
|
|
|
 By Governor Tim Pawlenty
As we begin a new year and Congress reconvenes, an unpleasant reality is increasingly hitting home with ordinary Americans: Leaders in both parties have irresponsibly run up debt. And, since President Obama took office, the debt crisis has grown exponentially worse. The only way to solve the problem in the long run is with a Constitutional amendment.
The facts tell the story. The average American household now carries over half-a-million dollars in Federal debt. And it’s growing quickly: The Obama administration is now predicting that the federal budget deficit will exceed $10 trillion through 2019. Meanwhile, some economists are predicting that in about 15 years, our public debt will be more than 100 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). And that figure is just the tip of the iceberg: If you look at all of the unfunded liabilities of the Federal government, the national debt right now is already at least $65 trillion.
With the Federal government taking in about $2 trillion a year, this runaway spending is not sustainable. If we continue down the current path of runaway deficits, we’re going to have the Federal government creating a public-finances-equivalent to the subprime mortgage meltdown in the not too distant future.
When a family or business faces the sort of revenue gap we are facing as a nation, they have to drastically tighten their belts. Government must do the same.
States across the country are making difficult choices to balance their books. In Minnesota, we’ve prioritized veterans, public safety and schools, while making difficult cuts to almost everything else in order to avoid even higher taxes. Most other states are making similar tough choices – choices that could grow even harder depending on the changes to Medicaid being proposed by Congressional Democrats.
Cutting spending is necessary because our nation’s fiscal imbalance threatens our future prosperity, our national security, and the heart of the American dream. Without change, sooner or later massive Federal debt will force painful spending cuts, higher taxes, a weaker dollar and runaway inflation.
Fortunately, it’s not too late to turn things around. By reining in our spending now, we can right our fiscal ship. We can extend freedom and opportunity by making government live within its means. We can safeguard our prospects for long-term, future prosperity that will make this country an even greater place for future generations to grow up, live, work and raise a family than it already is—but we must act.
Balancing the budget will require some tough decisions. Congress must reduce discretionary spending in real terms, with exceptions for key programs such as military, veterans, and public safety. The Congress must also reject costly new spending initiatives, like new health care entitlements.
In the long run, sending different politicians to Washington will not be enough. We need a mechanism in place to enforce balanced budgets, because regardless of which party is in power, they have not done a good job of getting budgets to balance over time. That’s why I’m calling for a Constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget, with exceptions for war, natural disasters, and other emergencies.
That won’t be easy; it will require a lot of hard work; and it will be a hard agenda to sell. That’s what leadership is about, though. My wish, as we begin this year, is for us to see much more of that from this administration and Congress.
Take Action: Sign the Balanced Budget Amendment Petition.
|
|
|
|
Comments (1)
|
|
|
|
Majority Report on Minnesota Election Discrepancies |
|
Dan's Blog
|
By Dan McGrath on
1/11/2010
|
|
|
|
A discrepancy remains between the 2008 Election canvassing board’s certified election results and the Statewide Voter Registration System (SVRS). Minnesota Majority’s initial research in May revealed that SVRS could not account for 40,000 votes certified by the canvassing board.
Legal Counsel for the Secretary of State’s office acknowledged a “widespread problem” to Minnesota Majority when the discrepancy was first raised. Subsequently, Secretary of State Mark Ritchie acknowledged the problem and told reporters his office was working to reconcile the numbers. In June of 2009, records indicated that the discrepancy had shrunk from 40,000 to about 30,000 ballots.
At the end of September 2009, Minnesota Majority again examined SVRS records and compared them to the canvassing board’s official election results and found that the discrepancy remains. The inability of SVRS to account for all the ballots cast on Election Day 2008 remains unexplained.
Drew Emmer interviewed Minnesota Majority president Jeff Davis on election issues. In Part 1, background on Minnesota Majority’s involvement and the unexplained records imbalance phenomenon were discussed.
Learn More:
|
|
|
|
Comments (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Featured Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 "Green Hell explains why Americans can't afford to fall for Al Gore's `the debate is over' line on global warming. While we're all for the environment, Green Hell explains why we need to oppose the environmentalists."
--Fred Barnes, Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard
"Green Hell is the `inconvenient truth' on extremist, growth-killing environmentalism. A must-read for those interested in keeping America free and prosperous."
--Steve Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes
"Regardless of whether you believe global warming is a fraud, the fact is that the current depression, the past spike in oil prices, and the coming technology of electric cars are all going to solve whatever problem exists. Liberals want to use climate change as an excuse to take over the economy and regulate everything and this book exposes their plans."
--Dick Morris, FOX News commentator and former political consultant to Bill Clinton
"This book describes why the world can't afford to fall for global warming alarmism and environmental hysteria. Steve Milloy shows how to avoid the environmentalists' vision of our future."
--VACLAV KLAUS, President of the European Union and President of the Czech Republic
"Free market capitalism is still the best path to prosperity. Green Hell is a must-read for anyone who wants to keep America on that path and away from Soviet-style command-and-control environmentalism."
--Larry Kudlow, Host, CNBC's The Kudlow Report
|
|
|
 |
|